![]() ![]() Linguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English. Evaluation of dentinal micro-cracks caused by the ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next and Reciproc rotary file systems used in root canal preparation. High quality Dental Rotary Endo Files Endodontic Rotary Systems 06 08 10 12 15 17 from China, Chinas leading 19mm flexible rotary files Product. How to cite this article: Deveci Taç M, Kaya S, Falakaloğlu S. Sample size was based on the difference between the Kedo-S-Square rotary file system and Hand K-files using the highest SD to account the variability. The ProTaper Universal file system caused more dentinal micro-cracking than did the ProTaper Next and Reciproc file systems. H-files were assumed to have a similar effect to the K-files but different from the rotary systems used in pediatric endodontics. In the groups ProTaper Universal and Reciproc files were used, 1 vertical root fracture was found in 9 mm sections for each.Ĭonclusion: Considering the limitations of in vitro studies, we can conclude that all rotary file systems used in this study led to dentinal micro-crack formation in roots. However, no significant difference was detected among groups ( p > 0.05). The K3 rotary nickel-titanium file system by SybronEndo is a state-of-the-art rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instrumentation method combines excellent cutting characteristics with a robust. The PTU files are rotary instruments that have been preloaded, presterilized, and assure maximal preservation of peri-cervical dentine. Replaces ProTaper and ProTaper Gold at 1/2 the cost. The highest rate of micro-crack formation was observed in specimens prepared with the ProTaper Universal file system (20%), followed by those prepared with the Reciproc (11.7%) and ProTaper Next (6.7%) file systems. Our promise is to deliver the highest quality rotary files and supplies for. Results: No micro-crack formation was observed in groups 1 and 2. The results were statistically assessed ( p ≤ 0.05). The following scoring system was used to rate specimens: 1, no micro-crack 2, incomplete micro-crack and 3, vertical root fracture. The sections were evaluated under a stereomicroscope. Following preparation, specimens were sectioned at 3, 6, and 9 mm using a Minitom precision cut-off machine. In groups 3–5, root canal preparation was performed using the ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, and Reciproc file systems, respectively. In group 2, preparation was performed using the step-back technique and K files. Group 1 served as a control, with no intervention. Method: One hundred mandibular anterior teeth were divided into five groups of 20 specimens each. Objective: In this study, we compared the occurrence of dentinal micro-cracks after use of the ProTaper Universal (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), ProTaper Next (Dentsply Maillefer), and Reciproc (VDW, Munich, Germany) nickel–titanium rotary file systems in root canal preparation. Micro-crack, ProTaper Universal, Reciproc, ProTaper Next Abstract ![]() Beylikduzu Oral and Dental Health Center, İstanbul, Turkey.ĭicle University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics, Diyarbakır, TurkeyĪfyonkarahisar Sağlık Bilimleri University, Department of Endodontics, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |